Campus Watch a New McCarthyism!!
WOCMES-2
Campus Watch a New McCarthyism!!
By
Mazin S. Motabagani
Associate Professor Orientalistics
Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Education
Introduction
In the
year 1988, I wrote to
Professor Bernard Lewis asking for an appointment as part of my ongoing
research on his methodology in his study of Islamic History. He wrote to me differentiating
between the “free world” where he lived and the “un-free world” where I live.
He described the “free world” “where you have no restrictions on your research
or findings”. This came to mind when I started preparing a paper on the contemporary
American Orientalism and their influence on the neo-conservatives in the Bush
Administration, and particularly when I came across the internet site called www.campus-watch.com.
In this
site, I found them to be a group of American scholars who are know to be
pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian and felt that they are fed up with the Middle East
studies discipline. They think that pro-Arab and pro- Palestinian has overtaken
this field. They also felt that the USA government is spending money on
people who are doing disservice to the country and its foreign policy. Here I said to myself is this really the “free
world” Lewis mentioned in his letter, or is it a new world?
The
site picked few examples that they thought fit this criteria. One example is
the appointment of Professor Waleed Al-Khaldi to the Edward Said Chair, and
also the appointment of Joseph Masad to a post at Columbia University .
Another example is Professor Roger Owen of Harvard University
who faced a harsh critique in this site, which made him respond in an article
he published in Al-Hayat daily Newspaper directing his fight back against campus
watch people and their attitude.
They
went on to device what was to be called a blacklist or professors who should be
ousted from American Universities. The leaders of this campaign were Daniel Pipes
and Martin Kramer. However, many scholars in this field some who were sited and
attacked while others felt the danger of such trend challenged this campaign.
It was
so many months after I submitted a proposal, I came across an article by
Professor Joel Benin using the term McCarthyism. However, Benin meant the whole attack on academic freedom
in the USA
while I used it just for the site campus-watch.com.
I may
not have been the first to use the term ‘McCarthyism’ to describe the new trend
to attack academic freedom, but to label the work of campus-watch site as such
maybe the first time. McCarthyism has had many victims in the USA . According to the wikipedia.org
these victims were in all occupations; actors, play write, physicist, athletes
and so on. This term has been in the
current use to mean “mass pressure, harassment or blacklisting used to pressure
people to follow popular political belief.” It adds that this all is done
“under the pretext of maintaining national security”. ([1])
This
paper will consist of two sections:
First: Analysis of Site performance
Secondly: Reaction to the site, where I will
look into the responses it invoked among scholars in the field of Middle
Eastern Studies.
Section I
Analysis of performance
The pro-Israel Middle East Forum has
recently launched www.campus-watch.org, a controversial new website that
monitors campus debate on the Arab-Israeli conflict. Specifically, the
website cites professors’ writings and speeches concerning Israel , be it positive or negative, details
activities on college campuses that relate to the Middle
East conflict, lists anti-Israel professors, and encourages
students to report occurrences of anti-Israel bias to the website. Through
these avenues the website’s creators hope to restore equity to academic debate
on the issues of the Israeli-Arab conflict.
Campus-Watch aims to amend
professors’ analytical errors, underline instances of politics mixing into
scholarship, criticize intolerance of alternative views, and highlight the
abuse of power in shaping students’ expressions of political feeling. It posts
articles from various professors that demonstrate a clear bias against Israel
as well as articles that criticize these professors.
The website also chronicles
anti-Israel events and instances of violence. Readers can thus learn about the
riot at Concordia University on September 9 that prevented a speech by
former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu; the pro-Palestinian divestment
conference at the University of Michigan on October 11-12; and the vandalizing of a
memorial to Israeli terror victims at Yale University
on October 22. The website tries to maintain objectivity by reporting all news
in the form of articles from college or local newspapers.
The website organizes its material
both chronologically and by college campus. Currently the site features reviews
of 23 universities, ranging from well-known institutions like Harvard, Stanford
and University of California- Berkeley to small colleges like Arizona State
and University of
Hawaii . The extensive
news section is frequently updated to keep pace with the large number of
articles and events that the website’s organizers consider to be flawed in
their political outlook.
The creators of Campus-Watch operate
under the assumption that the percentage of professors with anti-Israel views
is disproportionate to the percentage of people with such views in the general
populace. Interestingly, the website points out that the United States
government has identified positively with Israel since its founding, yet the
academic community in this country has never viewed the Jewish state in a
positive light. The academics that started Campus Watch hope to
counteract some of the negative impact that it perceives in the widespread
anti-Israel “intellectual” agenda.
Many academics, both non-Jewish and
Jewish, have opposed the mission of Campus-Watch. The website requests
students to report their teachers’ statements that they feel are biased against
Israel .
This section has been controversial and has generated a lot of criticism.
This method of gathering information limits free speech. In his
October 20, 2002 article for palestinechronicle.com, “Israeli Sympathizers’
Arrogance Knows No Bounds,” Raff Ellis writes concerning Campus-Watch: “The
main objective of these fascist style tactics is to totally suppress dissent,
to cultivate the approval of the masses and to strike fear into the hearts of
those whose conscience drives them to speak out against the daily injustices
heaped upon the Palestinians.” Even some professors who agree with the
website’s perspective on Israel
have criticized the page that requests people to report the statements of their
professors. They claim that the concept eerily resembles the McCarthy era
witch-hunts. Some have gone so far as to claim that the website intended
to draw such a parallel when it stated that it wished to develop dossiers on
every professor that unfairly criticizes Israel . The Campus-Watch administration
disputes the significance of the word “dossier.” It even says that it is
considering changing that word simply because it is impeding serious discussion
of the issues at hand, as some people cannot see past the incidental word
choice.
The first controversy of this site
was its involvement of publishing files on eight professors whom the site
claims to be anti- Israel .
This list has critically been called “the blacklist.” Upon learning of
the list, many professors who were opposed to the views of Campus-Watch, or at
least to their “blacklist,” asked to be listed along with the eight original
professors. Campus-Watch responded: “The fact that these individuals
insist on declaring solidarity in public with academics that Campus-Watch has identified
as apologists for Palestinian and Islamist violence is important information
for university stakeholders to be aware of, so we are posting their names, in
compliance with their wishes.”
The
long-range effect of this website and its attitude towards normative academia
is yet to be seen, but its stirring contribution to the current debate on
college campuses is indisputable.([2])
by Comentator
Volume 67, Issue 4
November 10, 2002
Kislev 5763
Volume 67, Issue 4
November 10, 2002
Kislev 5763
Since the site campus-watch is the creation of the Middle East
Forum. it is only logical to give a brief introduction of this forum. In 1990 the
forum was founded as a think tank to “promote American Interests in the Middle
East, defining interests to include fighting radical Islam ( rather than
terrorism), working for Palestinian acceptance of Israel …..etc) The forum claims
that one of its missions is to improve Middle East studies in North
America . The Forum is
directed by Daniel Pipes. This forum decided to create a web site to carry some
of the mission of the forum. The site itself describes its mission as to “gather
information on Middle East studies from public
and private sources and makes this information available on its website, www.Campus-Watch.org.” They also add
the following: “produce analyses of institutions, individual scholars, topics,
events, and trends. Makes its views known through the media - newspaper opeds,
radio interviews, television interviews. The owners of the site will use different
sources for their material such as students reports and complaints. ([3])
Activities of the Site
The site was very active in the field of collecting articles
and reports on the Middle East Studies in the USA . However, the site posted
Section II
Reaction to the Site
The neo-McCarthyism was faced with strong opposition since it
touched a large scale of scholars and professors in the American universities.
One of the prominent figures who wrote about this trend is Professor Joel Benin
–who used the term McCarthyism- in an article titled “The new American
McCarthyism: policing
In an effort to counter what they label as a McCarthyesque hunt by a
pro-Israel think tank, about 100 professors from across the country have asked
to be added to a "Campus Watch" Web site that singled out eight
professors because of their views on Palestine and Islam.
The Web site lists "dossiers" for the eight university
professors and teachers, including a graduate student instructor from UC
Berkeley, and portrays them as preaching dangerous rhetoric to students. The
site also calls them "hostile" to America . (Professors Want Own Names
Put on Mideast Blacklist
They hope to make it powerless by Tanya Schevitz) Saturday, September
28, 2002 in the San
Francisco Chronicle
The professors listed on the site have been spammed with tens of
thousands of racist, obscene and threatening e-mails.
have received more moral support and endorsement of my career as a
teacher and a scholar over the last couple of weeks than ever before," he
said.
". . . I have a stake in being party to voices of civilized dissent
against this horrific environment of fear, violence and intimidation that the
likes of Daniel Pipes want to perpetuate so that only their views are
heard."
Critics however have claimed that it's
real purpose is to attempt to intimidate academics who
have criticised the policies of Israel and the United
States in the Middle East . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campus_Watch
controversy over
Campus Watch, involving among other things, charges and counter-charges of
McCarthyism, is documented on the web site itself. Many opponents of Campus
Watch see it as an attempt to stifle any criticism of Israel in
American academia. [2][3]
[4][5]
Rashid
Khalidi, a Directory of the Middle East Institute at Columbia University and a target of Campus
Watch: "This noxious campaign is intended to silence such perfectly
legitimate criticism, by tarring it with the brush of anti-Semitism and
anti-Americanism, truly loathsome charges. They reveal the lengths that these
people apparently feel impelled to go to in order to silence a true debate on
campus." [6]
Joel Beinin, a
Professor of Middle East History at Stanford University, said this of Campus Watch:
"After
failing in his own pursuit of an academic career, [Daniel] Pipes has evidently
decided to take revenge on the scholarly community that rejected him. [....]
These efforts to stifle public debate about U.S. Middle East policy and
criticism of Israel
are being promoted by a network of neo-conservative true believers with strong
links to the Israeli far right. They are enthusiastic supporters of the Bush
administration's hands off approach to Ariel Sharon's suppression of the
Palestinian uprising and aggressive proponents of a preemptive U.S. strike against Iraq ." [7]
Political
scientists John Mearsheimer and Stephen
Walt wrote in March 2006 that Campus Watch was founded by
"passionately pro-Israel neoconservatives" with the intention of
"encourag[ing] students to report comments or behavior that might be
considered hostile to Israel" and that it was a "transparent attempt
to blacklist and intimidate scholars."[8]
^ Daniel Pipes, Is Campus Watch Part of
a Conspiracy?, Middle East Forum, May 12, 2006
^ The War on Academic Freedom by
Kristine McNeil, The Nation, November 11, 2002
^ Zionism vs. Intellectual Freedoms on American College Campuses, David Green, ZMag
^ Short Cuts, Sarah Roy, London Review of Books,
April 1 2004
^ The New Commissars Anders Strindberg,
The American Conservative, February 2 2004
^ ADC Denounces New Efforts to Chill
Academic Freedom, Press Release, Arab Americans Anti-Discrimination Committee,
September 26 2002
^ Who's Watching the Watchers?, Joel
Beinin, History News Network, September 30 2002
^ The Israel
Lobby and U.S.
Foreign Policy, John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, March 2006
Retrieved from
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campus_Watch"
Categories
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق