Is Islam A Threat to the West?
As a graduate student of
the department of Orientalistics at the Higher Institute of Islamic Da’wa,
Muhammad Ben Saud Islamic University-Riyadh, it is part of my academic interest
to read how Islam is represented in the American and English Media.
Two months ago Professor T.
B. Irving (Haj Ta’lim Ali” sent me a short newsletter containing an article
written by Rev. R. Marston Speight titled “What will be the next bug-bear?”
Though Rev. Speight is the director of the Office on Christian- Muslim
Relations at Hartford Seminary, he has taken the initiative to speak on behalf
of Islam.
In his article Rev. Speight
expressed his apprehension and fear about the new campaign against Islam in the
American media. He said :” As a result of the tumultuous and astonishing events
in Eastern Europe, the forces of the world communism no longer seem as
threatening as they did before. So those Americans who constantly dwelt on the
supposed danger of communism to our nation are suddenly left deprived of one of
their favorite themes.”
Based on Rev. Speight’s
knowledge of how Islam is represented in the American media, he drew the
conclusion that “ Islam will be set forth as the new bogey man.”
The example cited in the
above newsletter is the syndicated column by Charles Krauthammer (Feb.19, 1990)
in which he wrote under the banner “Islam lunches a new global crusade”. This
crusade is also termed as “a global intifadah” struggling for” political
independence and political domination.”
The distortion is even more
apparent when Krauthammer tries to show why the Islamic struggle is
“threatening” by saying that “the force of Islam is autocratic and intolerant”
and in the Islamic world self-determination is permitted only to Moslems (sic)”
To cite another example in
this lengthy subject, Professor Bernard Lewis (Emeritus of Princeton
University) and presently the director of Annenberg Institute for Judaic and
Near Eastern Studies) was chosen to give the annual Thomas Jefferson lecture at
the Library of Congress. The title of his lecture was purely academic, but the
contents were quite polemical. The title “Western society s viewed from Islamic
Perspective” could be justly put” Why Muslims hate America?” or “a new cold war
with
Islam”
Lewis said in his lecture:”
But Islam like other religions, has also known periods when it inspired in some
of its followers, a mood of hatred and violence.”
Lewis moves from speaking about Islam as a religion
to his favorite topic of fundamentalists, radicals, etc. and their views of the
west. He said:” the struggle of the fundamentalists is against two enemies;
secularism and modernism.”
A
third example of what type of representation Islam receives in America is the
commencement address of the graduation and commissioning ceremony of the class
of 1990 of the US Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland, by the United States
Vice President on May 30th.1990.
In
his speech the Vice President said:” We have been surprised this past century
by the rise of Communism, the rise of Nazism, and the rising of radical Islamic
Fundamentalism. I am sure we’ll be surprised in the future as well. Though we
may be surprised, let us always be prepared.”
If
the Vice President is surprised by the rise of “radical Islamic Fundamentalism
“ it is also surprising that he terms the Islamic revival or resurgence as
radical fundamentalism and even more surprising is to link Islam with Nazism
and Communism.
I have
talked about three examples on how Islam is featured in the American Media. I
am certain that a great many more examples exist, but they are inaccessible to
the writer due to their unavailability.
As for the
article of Krauthammer we need not say much sine Rev. Speight’s comments in his
newsletter are quite sufficient, and we can’t agree with him more. (As for his
incentive to defend Islam may be taken in another article)
Speight
said, “ The information in that column is badly distorted. The worst thing in
it is the statement that Islam is engaged in a concreted movement Worldwide.
There is a central authority in Islam, so any political or ideological struggle
on a global scale is out of question.”
Then Speight
gave his recommendation on the matter by saying that readers must be “ alert to
counter such unreasonable attacks as Kruthammer’s with authentic information
regarding Islam and the World where Muslim peoples are involved. Here we must
thank and appreciate Rev. Speight’s words. Moreover we wish that his newsletter
be widely distributed in the US. Where many writers like Kruthammer are
spreading their poison.
The case of
Professor Lewis is quite different. He is an acclaimed scholar of Islamic
History an Islamic currant affairs. What he voices out is taken for granted to
be the truth. However, his lecture has drawn wide reaction among Muslims and
non-Muslims in the USA. Though I believe that it is too little to counter an
influential speaker such as Lewis.
These
articles were as follows:
1-
An article by Mike Feishllber in the Oak Tribune
on May 5th. 1990.
2-
Professor T. B. Irving’s article in the Impact
International, 27 July –9th. August and reproduced in the Hong
Kong Herald in August 1990.
3-
Oppenion by Mowahid H. Shah in the Christian Science
Monitor on July 30th.1990.
4-
Editorial of “ Muslim Media Watch Newsletter, May –June
1990.
However,
before reviewing the above articles we must say that there are many who support
Bernard Lewis. One of these is the article appeared in the Christian Science
Monitor on May 7th. 1990 by Rushworth Kidder in which he said:”
His theme is (Lewis’s) the revulsion
against western values and manners that is spitting from Fundamentalist
segments of the Islamic World. He concluded that America as the “heir of
European civilization “ has become the focus on which (the Muslim World’s\)
pent-up hate and anger coverage” Kidder also said that Lewis’ lecture “ could
not have been more timely.”
To turn to
Lewis’s critique, we find that T. B. Irving summing up in two sentences as
follows:” on May 2, 1990 Lewis read a 26 page diatribe against Islam at the
Library of Congress in which he viewed Islam as an enemy of the West, with the
United States as its principal adversary.”
Another
critique of Lewis and that is the editorial by the Muslim Media Watch
Newsletter in which the editor wrote: ” as if all the anti-Islamism shown
by the Media was not enough, how a government agency has joined the effort. The
National Endowment for the Humanities has paid 10,000 dollars to Bernard Lewis,
a retired Professor of History who has been selling stereotypes,
oversimplifications and distortions—all carefully packaged ant-Islamism—to
gullible audience.
The
Newsletter goes onto say about Lewis “ starting with the loaded question “ why
Muslims hate America? Lewis has been telling his audience “ resentment and
anger of the Muslim masses toward America –is only the latest outbreak in a
long struggle between Islam and Christendom.” What the newsletter did not say is
why should such an ardent Zionist take the case on behalf of Christens? What is
the real attitude of Islam toward the issues raised by Lewis, Kruthammer and
the Vice President and many other writes?
Hope to
tackle these issues in other articles.
.
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق